"The hero is represented in the most extraordinary of attitudes: the head is thrown back, and the face turned towards one side; the legs in a sort of studied posture; a drawn sword is in the right hand, the point somewhat raised. The general expression is that of a comic actor attempting an attitude of mock-heroic impertinence; and is probably the result of an unattained object in the mind of the artist, of producing that of fearless independence."
This is Nathaniel's damning verdict on an oil painting of El Cid that once hung in the Ayuntamiento - not a very good one it seems. It was presumably put there by those who genuinely wished to honour the great man whose bones rested amongst them. But Nathaniel has no time for this picture. To him it's an artistic failure, rubbish.
Only, is it just the picture he has no time for? Really he is not just dissing whatever poor provincial artist attempted the likeness of Spain's great preserver: inevitably, by association, he is ridiculing the hero himself.
El Cid statue in the centre of modern Burgos |
This is an unpopular viewpoint, at least in the west. The statue above was put up only sixty years ago, a mere six years before Hollywood canonised El Cid in the person of Charlton Heston. Like the film, it aims to show El Cid as the magnificent champion of Christian Spain against the Moors, and that is still very much how he is seen by many in Spain today. But we soon learn that, for Nathaniel, El Cid's hero status is overblown, ambiguous, untrustworthy - undeserved.
"For those who are satisfied with the orthodox histories of the monks, he is without defects—a simple unsophisticated demi-god. But there have been Mahometan historians of Spain. These are universally acknowledged to have treated of all that concerned themselves with complete accuracy and impartiality; and, when this happens, it should seem to be the best criterion, in the absence of other proof, of their faithful delineation of others' portraits."
The icon of one group will often be the hate figure of another. I am sensing something significant about Nathaniel, which is that he loves Spain so much not for its triumphant Christian past, but for its lost Moorish civilization. His derogatory attitude to El Cid is the litmus test which proves something profound about him.
Deep, deep down, Nathaniel Armstrong Wells Esq. of Piercefield, Monmouthshire, wishes the Africans had won.